1972 California Proposition 11

Elections in California
U.S. President
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
  • v
  • t
  • e
Executive
Governor
Lieutenant governor
Attorney general
Secretary of state
Treasurer
Controller
Insurance commissioner
Superintendent
Board of equalization

Legislature
Senate
Assembly

Judiciary
Court of appeals

Elections by year
  • v
  • t
  • e
1910–1919
1960–1969
1970–1979
1980–1989
1990–1999
2000–2009
2010–2019
2020–2029
Full list
  • v
  • t
  • e
Other localities
Bakersfield

Mayoral elections:

Fresno

Mayoral elections:

Oakland

Mayoral elections:

Riverside

Mayoral elections:

San Bernardino

Mayoral elections:

Stockton

Mayoral elections:

  • v
  • t
  • e
  • v
  • t
  • e
Part of the common law series
Tort law
(Outline)
Trespass to the person
Property torts
Dignitary torts
Negligent torts
Principles of negligence
Strict and absolute liability
Nuisance
Economic torts
Defences
Liability
Remedies
Other topics in tort law
By jurisdiction
Other common law areas
  • icon Law portal
  • v
  • t
  • e

Proposition 11, sometimes known as the "Privacy Initiative" or the "Right to Privacy Initiative", was a ballot initiative to amend the constitution of the state of California to include privacy as an inalienable right to citizens in "Article 1: Declaration of Rights" of the constitution.

The Proposition was co-authored by California State Assemblyman Kenneth Cory (D-Garden Grove) and California State Senator George Moscone (D-San Francisco) as a protective measure against government agencies collecting personal information from citizens.[1] Assemblyman Cory also expressed specific concern for privacy due to the potential threat that new technology had on compromising privacy.[1] Opponents of the measure argued that such an initiative was unnecessary since the courts and State Legislature already had the power to address issues of privacy.[1]

On November 7, 1972, the proposition overwhelmingly passed and consequently resulted in explicit references to privacy in the California State Constitution.[2]

Subsequently, Supreme Court of California decisions have used this enumerated right to grant additional rights beyond those of the California Constitution. Abortion restrictions[3] and occupancy rules that required blood relations for residents in single family zoned homes[4] were struck down under Proposition 11's guarantee to privacy, as well as discovery regarding a sexual harassment victim's sexual history and drug tests of college athletes.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b c Blake, Gene (October 18, 1972). "Prop. 11 Adds Privacy to Peoples' Rights in California Constitution". Los Angeles Times. p. C7. Retrieved June 4, 2008.
  2. ^ Grodin, Joseph R.; Calvin R. Massey; Richard B. Cunningham (1993). The California State Constitution: A Reference Guide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 23–24. ISBN 0-313-27228-X.
  3. ^ "Column: Abortion may soon return to the national political debate, but it's largely settled in California". Los Angeles Times. July 8, 2018. Retrieved May 3, 2022.
  4. ^ "City of Santa Barbara v. Adamson, 27 Cal.3d 123 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved May 3, 2022.
  5. ^ Kelso, J Clark (January 15, 1992). "California's Constitutional Right to Privacy" (PDF).


Stub icon

This article about the politics of California is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e
Flag of United StatesJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e